If your phone or email notification preference has changed, please log in at http://opac.tulsalibrary.org/patroninfo and click “Modify Info” to update your account.

Bram Stoker's Dracula

DVD - 2007
Average Rating: 3.5 stars out of 5.
Bram Stoker's Dracula
15th-century warrior Vlad goes off the fight the Turks. Upon his return, he finds that his wife Elisabeta, hearing he was dead, has killed herself. Maddened by this injustice, Vlad curses God, and becomes the immortal blood-eating fiend known as Count Dracula--for centuries. When English attorney Jonathan Harker journeys to Dracula's castle, the Count sees a photograph of his fiancée, Mina Murray. Dracula's patience has been rewarded--Elisabeta lives again! The Count goes to dastardly lengths to possess Mina, while her best friend Lucy, Lucy's three suitors, and Prof. Abraham Van Helsing all become entangled by Dracula's quest. The modern age is dawning, even in Transylvania. Will the Count triumph, or be relegated to the past?

Publisher: Culver City, CA : Columbia Pictures Industries : Distributed by Sony Pictures Home Entertainment, [2007]
Edition: Collector's ed
ISBN: 1404912509
Branch Call Number: DVD
Characteristics: 2 videodiscs (127 min.) : sd., col. ; 4 3/4 in
Alternate Title: Dracula


From the critics

Community Activity


Add a Comment

Jul 10, 2014
  • babyboy04 rated this: 5 stars out of 5.

I love vampires books and movies. They are my favarite thing to watch.

May 17, 2014
  • jazeebelle rated this: 1 stars out of 5.

This film is beautiful. The score is amazing.... Gary Oldman does not disappoint. That being said, this is one of the worst waste of film i've ever seen. Ryder and Reeves are ridiculous and should stick to surfer movies. Blech. Peeee-ew.... waste of time.

Dec 11, 2013
  • SAPL454 rated this: 5 stars out of 5.

This Dracula adaptation proved to be very classical in nature, bringing with it great actors and a believable story line!

Dec 10, 2013
  • Keogh rated this: 5 stars out of 5.

A full blooded adaptation of the Stoker story benefits from Oldman in the lead, with Anthony Hopkins, Winona Ryder, Cary Elwes, Richard Grant, and Bill Campbell all doing good turns in various roles. The one glaring problem with the film: Keanu Reeves, who can't hold an English accent for more than five minutes and lacks the presence the role required. He should count himself lucky that Speed and the Matrix were films still in his future when he made this.

Nov 15, 2012
  • pronto1961 rated this: 3 stars out of 5.

gary oldman. gary oldman. gary oldman!!!!!! oh, and tom waits!!! enough said.

Jul 05, 2012
  • Mocha6ft3 rated this: 3 stars out of 5.

It was too tempting for me to see this movie available on "Super Bit" for $5.00 and not buy it. I will admit i was not that happy while watching this movie on my HOMETHEATER. But the visual effects were great and Mr.Oldman was impressive as Dracula. The shape shifting, mist movements and shadows were done very well. The werewolf that turns into rats was very good.There are some good sound effects, but mostly all around sound. However, when Dracula was not in a scene, i wasn't feeling this movie that much. It was not boring. Just some of the characters were not that interesting and it made the film drag a bit for me. But i'll give this movie 3 stars. For Gary Oldman's performace of Dracula, and the visual effetcs. 2 large home made hamburgers with plenty of ketchup and a touch of mustard, with thick french fries, two rolls, and a large glass filled with ice and rootbeer.

Feb 13, 2012
  • IAmARobot7 rated this: 5 stars out of 5.

Keanu Reeves SUCKED.
Gary Oldman was a GOD:)

Jul 17, 2011
  • EuSei rated this: 0.5 stars out of 5.

I can’t believe I went to the theater to watch this movie—and stayed till the end! Not even two great actors—Oldman and Hopkins—could have saved this pastiche. There are so many problems and ridiculous scenes I kept wondering if it was not actually meant as some dark comedy… No surprise on Reeves and Ryder, two of the worse actors ever—he, as always wooden-looking and she squirming and giving little moans and cries that made her look even more like the little mouse she is. And why—oh, why?!—do they get American actors to imitate British accent?! In short, this is the story of bitter, baby-killer, brutal, odd-looking Count Dracul, who surrounds himself with a bunch of nymphomaniacs; he lives from orgy to sucking blood from babies, to finally find his beloved, a the mousy, perverted, sex-crazed Mina, etc, etc, etc. Oh, did I forget to mention Oldman’s ATROCIOUS accent, which will make you LOL and, at the same time, wish you could wring his neck?

Nov 22, 2010
  • haPPY_FUn_baLL rated this: 0.5 stars out of 5.

OMG this was a terrible movie. Keanu Reeves' attempted English accent was a crime against language. Bram Stoker probably did a few spins in his grave after Coppola's treatment of his classic novel. Even Anthony Hopkins turns in a rare stinky performance. In a nutshell - this movie encapsulates the worst of 1990's Hollywood. Thankfully they did not make a sequel..."Dracula 2 - this time he's twice as undead!"

Nov 07, 2010
  • LcoyoteS rated this: 1 stars out of 5.

Why this movie is called “Bram Stoker’s Dracula” is beyond me, since it bears little resemblance to Stoker’s novel. By the end of the movie you don’t care about any of the characters, since they’re all so depraved. You certainly don’t feel any sympathy for the baby-killing Count Dracul, even though at the end you are presumably supposed to feel glad that he finally finds peace.

None of the characters are able to control their sexual desires, even the cross-wielding Van Helsing. The women especially are portrayed as weak and fallible. They are portrayed as either prim and proper prudes or sex-crazed whores, with the former quickly becoming the latter. Love is equated with lust. There are countless scenes of perverted sex with copious amounts of blood. One particularly disgusting scene involved one of Dracula’s concubines licking blood squirting from another concubine’s nipple.

The movie is just one long orgy of depraved sex and blood-sucking, with a ridiculous ending tacked on. There doesn’t seem to be any rationale for Mina Harker’s adulterous passion for Dracula – why would anyone become besotted with a mass-murderer who turns into a werewolf to have bestial sex with other women? Why does the movie end with Mina saying that her love for Dracula was their salvation, as if it is a noble thing to “love” someone even more evil than Jeffrey Dahmer? To me, love is fidelity, self-sacrifice, and the cultivation of virtue, not adultery, lust, and an eternal “life” of vampirism.

View All Comments


Add Age Suitability

Jul 10, 2012

Cybermouse thinks this title is suitable for 18 years and over

Mar 07, 2012
  • IAmARobot7 rated this: 5 stars out of 5.

IAmARobot7 thinks this title is suitable for 17 years and over

Sep 26, 2010
  • Ugogurl rated this: 3 stars out of 5.

Ugogurl thinks this title is suitable for 21 years and over


Add a Summary

Sep 26, 2010
  • Ugogurl rated this: 3 stars out of 5.

Count (Lord) Dracula ascends upon England to wreak havoc on the fiancee of a man who Dracula wants as his own.

In this evil love story Reeves is the unsuspecting muse of Gary Oldman, while Hopkins & Ryder try to save him from the dark underworld.

Gary Oldman, Keanu Reeves, Anthony Hopkins and Winona Ryder do an excellent job all around.

Not recommended for anyone under 21, due to the graphic sexual scenes and pure evilness portrayed.


Add a Notice

There are no notices for this title yet.


Add a Quote

There are no quotes for this title yet.

Find it at TCCL